Zombie Apocalypse

Der Mensche im Zombiemodus

Happy Bonfire Night! Happy Election Day! Let’s hope for (and work toward) a brighter future, whatever the outcome of the election today.

V for Vendetta - 2005

I've wanted to follow up on my September 3rd post — The ‘Hippo’ in the Room: ‘Connecting the dots’ — for some time now. Right after I posted this, a book that had been recommended to me (that I'd ordered but hadn't yet received) finally arrived. The Indoctrinated Brain, it turns out, is where all that talk of the ‘hippocampus’ originated. Coincidentally, just a week later, I was fortunate enough to have lunch with Ulrike Granögger, who had recently interviewed the author this book, Dr. Michael Nehls. Ulrike was in Toronto for a conference and (as this world gets smaller and smaller) it seems now almost fated that our paths should cross. Before I go on though, let me share with you that interview. If you have a couple of hours, the following will be of great interest:

Future Science Series: The Indoctrinated Brain with Dr. Michael Nehls.

I'd not made the connection with this book before because ‘indoctrination’ implies a psychological process and condition; Nehls' work however, is mainly about physical (and functional) changes in the brain that increase the individual's susceptibility to indoctrination. Specifically, an accelerated degradation of hippocampal function resulting in a phenomena known as 'Zombie mode' — Der Mensche im Zombiemodus — before the victim descends into early onset Alzheimer’s disease (something that has become alarmingly common these past few years). When writing about this before, I chose not to use the word ‘zombie,’ though as you know, this is a term we hear often now; and today, in particular, it feels appropriate.

The recent cultural fascination with zombies (whatever this might say about the psychological condition of those with an affinity for such things), is still a form of entertainment. No one actually believes such a thing could be real, but what if this were a real possibility? Every zombie, scenario is different, so we shouldn’t expect a real-world situation to play out quite like any of these. Some see real-world ‘zombieism’ (if that's a word), manifesting something more like this —violent and offensive language:

"Go! We've zapped three of them this morning, they're everywhere today. . ."

I realize now it must be the cathartic quality of zombie films that just keeps people coming back for more :-)

The image above, and catchy epithet below, I credit to Jeff Berwick of course, the Dollar Vigilante, and I will return to this later.

Thanks to Barack ‘drone-bomber’ Obama, ‘agent provocateur,’ there is a whole other variation on this theme. The controllers of mass-culture present here another, more believable, apocalyptic scenario (another piece of predictive programming). He and Michelle Obama were executive-producers of Leave the World Behind, which promotes the idea (the psychological projection and instigation) of civil unrest.

This was followed, of course, earlier this year, by the film Civil War; an independent (we’re meant to believe) dystopian thriller. “Don't ask questions, just shoot,” was the salient idea (takeaway) from this film; as left and right are pitted even more firmly against each other. Civil discourse is now actively discouraged by the controllers of mass-culture. I don’t know Alex Garland, who wrote and directed Civil War, and I’ve not met the Obamas of course.

Dor Brothers, Viral Videos. Lies Wide Shut

Putting aside, for a moment, all the conspiracy theory stuff around Obama (from the Dor Brothers and popular figures like Jeff Berwick). Some years ago, because of my art world connections, I was introduced to the Head Legal Counsel of the CIA, John Rizzo. He was the good friend of a collector of my paintings in Washington D.C., and it was suggested we meet to compare notes on our respective writing projects. Not surprisingly, I learned a lot in the course of our conversations (but most of this must wait for another time).

It isn’t just Jeff Berwick (who came up with the Barak ‘drone-bomber’ epithet), Obama is widely regarded as a destabilizing, if not dangerous figure. John Rizzo left the CIA, in fact, as result of Obama, as he explains in his 2014 book: Company Man, 30 years of Controversy and Crisis in the CIA.

I suggest you add this revealing work to your reading list. After serving under seven presidents, from Ford on, Obama's indiscriminate drone-bombing was the final straw. Those ‘surgical’ strikes were not at all surgical; they took out whole families (at weddings and gatherings of the kind), creating anger, and an even greater divisions between east and west. Of course, this caused the good guys in the CIA more problems too, as you will read in this book. John had lived through a lot (over thirty years of US covert operations), Barack’s drone bombing though, crossed the line. I must share some of the other revelations, and an account of one evening in particular — a rainy night at a Georgetown Steak House — when John and I finally got to meet in person (but again, this is a story for another time).

As for the zombie apocalypse, the left would dismiss such ideas as crazy right-wing fear mongering; they are more afraid of ‘Trumpers’ than zombies. Whoever wins this election, it seems the other side is not going to accept the outcome. Those on the left now see those on the right as people they can no longer even talk to; and vice versa. In extreme cases, the other side is now portrayed as barely human, thanks to mainstream media — divided and conquer — propaganda channels; and this is the most terrifying thing of all. Today, almost irreconcilable opposites see the other side as insane, at best; no surprise of course, after predictive programming projects such as Civil War, and videos like: ‘Five Guns you Must Have Before the 2024 Elections.’

There's probably no point in running through those irreconcilable differences nurtured in the left and right, but Jeff Berwick, in his inimitable way, sums the right's view of the left, as follows:

“Most people are idiots. They're dumbed-down and they're fluoridated. They're chem-trailed and they're lethally injected. They're eating poison and they go to twelve years of government indoctrination camps. They watch literal mind-control, hours per day — tell lie vision. It [TV] doesn't even try to hide what it is: tell a vision. It puts a vision into your head and programs you.”

Now, there is certainly no shortage of ‘idiots’ on the right. My friends on the left (yes, I still have a few) would certainly agree with this, but are Jeff's suggestions crazy? His talk of climate modification, not-so-safe and effective mRNA, poisonous fluoride and poisoned processed food? The left can no longer say, ‘Oh, that's all just a conspiracy theory.’ There is too much evidence now. Those on the right (those who are not idiots of course) continue to cite the kind of evidence that would stand up in court, and this cannot not be dismissed; but the left, still, refuses to acknowledge anything that contradicts the official narrative, on any subject.

Here, especially, I am speaking to our elected representatives, who are duty-bound to look at this evidence, or they may eventually be found criminally negligent. In time (should that time come before their current term is up), it may be reasonable to claim ‘cognitive decline’ as a result of the mRNA jabs. And this may be their ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ card, assuming they look at the evidence now, and choose an appropriate course of action before it is too late. Those who assume they are untouchable, legally speaking, may be in for a nasty surprise.

Continuing with the evidence: The term zombie apocalypse, it turns out, is not so much an insult (emerging from frustration and fear) it springs from a serious ‘condition’ (as alluded to above). From the introduction of Dr. Michael Nehls' book:

‘[T]he conditions for the proper functioning of the organ responsible for memorizing our thoughts [the hippocampus], which are necessary for thinking at all, are diminished more and more. Nowadays, the autobiographical memory of many people no longer grows throughout our lives, as it would naturally, and thus increasingly loses its storage capacity. This makes it almost impossible for many people to consider or even implement courses of action that do not conform to their daily routines - even when their very lives or freedom depends on it. Instead, people follow trained beliefs. The resulting stereotyped behaviour is what the British physicist and molecular biologist Francis Crick (1916 - 2004), Nobel laureate in 1962 for the discovery of the molecular nature of heredity, and his then colleague, the American neuroscientist Christof Koch, called Zombie mode. . .’

This realization has caught people's imagination. Not only is a large segment of the population (on both sides) completely ‘indoctrinated’ it appears that there is an actually physiological process underway that explains the strange behaviour we've been observing in recent years: changed personality, an inability to connect dots — that is, an inability to remember the past and connect it to what is happening now — dismissal of anything out of the ordinary (anything the mainstream media isn't talking about) as conspiracy theory, an inability to accept documented evidence (if it doesn't conform to the mainstream narrative); most notably, perhaps, aggression to those who counter this narrative. . . Hopelessness, apathy and depression are perhaps the most common symptoms of indoctrination on the other side. The list goes on, and as a result, we see Bertrand Russell’s prediction become reality:

‘Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.’

‘Trapped in zombie mode, it is impossible for victims to question their own own precarious situation,’ Nehls states in ‘Individuality, creativity, and the ability to think for oneself,’ Chapter 2 of The Indoctrinated Brain:

‘All of this culminates in an extremely disturbing situation: not only is there the danger of an accelerated loss of identity due to the limited functionality and reduced capacity of autobiographical memory, there is also the danger the identity-forming memories will be replaced by foreign content — that is, by propaganda or aspects of the technocratic narrative, both of which lead to mental conformity to society.’

Now, there are causes beyond the experimental mRNA technology that exacerbates all of the above, that also contribute to the decline of hippocampal function. It is the neurogenisis of the hippocampus (which produces so-called ‘index’ cells) that allows memories from the short-term storage of the hippocampus (equivalent to RAM in computer terms) to be stored and readily accessible in the long-term memory of the neocortex (the equivalent of a hard drive, in computer terms).

If hippocampal generation of ‘index cells’ declines (for whatever reason) new memories start to overwrite old memories as existing index cells are scavenged to archive (what we might now consider) more important memories. I would compare this to clearing out old mail in a now unused (but still active) email account. In order to keep anything important that comes in now, I have to chose what old information is no longer required. As time goes on, the overwriting of old information becomes more radical. Emotionally charged, ‘fear porn’ propaganda information, always tricks the brain into prioritizing it, over old memories (in those not aware of this process). As old memories disappear, our actual identity is modified and we become different people. In the end (in this biological form) we are the sum of our remembered experiences.

* 89 Josephine Barnes et al., "A Meta-Analysis of Hippocampal Atrophy Rates in Alzheimer’s Disease," Neurobiology of Ageing 3’, no. 11 (November 2009): 1711-23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2773132/

We see here the 'normal' degrading of hippocampal function, which isn't the same as the ‘natural’ decline (as illustrated). Normally, the hippocampus functions well into old age, as we always have (or should have) new memories to store; and this should not be at the cost of existing memories. clearly, there are pre-existing — pre-mRNA — reasons for this decline. I shouldn't get too deep into this here, but three components lacking in the typical diet contribute to this hippocampal decline (Nehls’ work, and others like it, state). These are listed as: aquatic Omega-3 fatty acids, Iodine and Vitamin D3. The fact that there are unnecessary deficiencies, Nehls suggests, is intentional; the result of accepted health guidelines:

‘The suspicion arises that power over people, achieved and consolidated by reducing their mental capacity, is the real goal.’ pg 68

In the accelerated phase of hippocampal decline, the loss of function rises from 1.4% per year to 5%, and this is without taking into consideration additional mRNA decline.

‘[T]he injection of modified viral genetic material encoding the toxic SARS-CoV2 spike protein serves as a particularly perfidious example. This spiking (as Nehls explains in chapter 4) inhibits hippocampal growth and activates neurodegeneration.’

I could go on with excerpts from this work, and many existing studies, but what have we observed that might indicate something ‘perfidious’ afoot?

Number one, is the fact that those we expect to represent us (who we expect to be concerned with our well being) are simply not interested to hear any of this. They ignore any documentation, whatsoever, that contradicts the official narrative. But the weight of evidence is catching up with the derelict, if not criminally negligent, officials and bureaucratic operatives. Lawsuits are underway around the world (although these are still not covered by the bought-and-paid-for mainstream media), and they will accelerate. A tidal wave is coming, and a lot of individuals will be hung out to dry, so to speak.

If the zombie apocalypse, or civil war, actually does happen, then all bets are off of course; and then the accused could be facing tribunals, of one kind or another. As it stands, the current trend will continue, and those in office currently (those in the back office too) might well prepare for legal action in the near future. There are a lot of pissed off people in the world.

Perhaps it is time to start compiling all of the legal cases that are currently moving forward around the world, and present these to Council. This is something we can all do of course. . . It’s ‘all hands on deck’ time now. But that's enough from me, for the moment.

Once again, thank you for your interest, and on going support,

David