Sorry for the delay, and the short reply. We're preparing for a big event this coming weekend and I'm swamped.
(1) By 'money launderers and defrauders' I'm guessing you mean the Banks. . . like TD, with its current $2.6 billion penalty for assisting money launders? You'd be surprised to know who many people don't believe Human Trafficking is even a thing. . . It's too horrible to contemplate of course, and accepting this might mean actually having to get off the couch (or away from the keyboard).
(2) Dr. Martin is an expert in medical patents and bioweapons (when you look at his background). . . You've inspired me to do another piece on this subject. Your average doctor just keeps his head down (I know this for a fact as I have - or had - friends who are doctors) and they won't say anything that might cost them their license - 'Why Your DOCTOR is ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED' : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAvemcgLa-8
Thanks for your other messages, I'll look forward to chatting again,
I have found nothing to suggest Martin should even be at the discussion table. I think he may have a serious case of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophenia
I support monetary reform and a change in economic policy for the benefit of the people.
Two questions on this post:
What are Martin's credentials?
Why wouldn't constitutional rights protect us from your worst fears? Criminals sometimes get off because of our rigid support of constitutional rights.
(1). David E. Martin' credentials: 'National Intelligence Analyst, Founder of IQ100 Index (NYSE)' - Developer of linguistic genomics: https://youtu.be/NJhAOETXlNw?t=15
I've not seen anyone try to debunk these qualifications (coincidentally, I questioned Reuters' dubious fact checking in my last post).
(2). A lot of people (in Canada) don't think that the Constitution provides real protection, because of the Notwithstanding Clause and the degree to which many points are open to interpretation. Some feel the Bill of Rights offers individuals better protection. I'm not a lawyer of course. Brian Peckford and Maxime Bernier's Constitutional Challenge on travel restrictions was shut down - dismissed as 'Mute' - when travel restrictions were lifted. So we don't know the Constitutionality of this because the courts would not let the case proceed. I've even been called 'far-right' while canvasing, just for mentioning 'the Constitution.' So there are larger issues here that need to be addressed.
With respect to the Reuters' piece, again. The definition of Pandemic was changed in order to market mRNA products as 'vaccines,' and Dr. David Martin is precisely right in his explanation of how these products work (if you read the manufacturers own documents). Martin is quoted as saying (though that video has been removed): "It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator.” This is correct. The problems discovered since 2021 however, are: (a) there is no control of how much or how little 'pathogen' is created by the body; and (b) when, or if, the body's own creation of this pathogen (spike protein) shuts off. These are major problems that haven't been addressed:
As mentioned above. MP Ted Falk asked a lot of questions in parliament with regards to Bill C-293, 'An Act respecting pandemic prevention and preparedness.' These questions were not answered before Liberals and NDP pushed this Bill though the House of Commons (it now in Senate for Second Reading). His questions can be seen at open Parliament, here:
1. I am not sure you addressed my belief that the hyper vigilant constitutional rights would make a surveillance society impossible. Though technology could help us better find and prosecute the tiny percent of the population the launders money, defrauds, deals in black markets including human trafficking, and evades taxes.
2. Also the linkedin profile shows Martin is very academically accomplished but does not show true expertise in medicine, in particular immunology, viruses, epidemiology, etc.
anymore than he is able to perform surgery.
To illustrate, I was once sent by my GP to a specialist, he sent me to several other specialists. One of which sent me to someone with a speciality within that specialty.
The world is complicated. I highly recommend the book - The Knowledge Illusion.
Hi Joe,
Thanks again for your comments.
Sorry for the delay, and the short reply. We're preparing for a big event this coming weekend and I'm swamped.
(1) By 'money launderers and defrauders' I'm guessing you mean the Banks. . . like TD, with its current $2.6 billion penalty for assisting money launders? You'd be surprised to know who many people don't believe Human Trafficking is even a thing. . . It's too horrible to contemplate of course, and accepting this might mean actually having to get off the couch (or away from the keyboard).
(2) Dr. Martin is an expert in medical patents and bioweapons (when you look at his background). . . You've inspired me to do another piece on this subject. Your average doctor just keeps his head down (I know this for a fact as I have - or had - friends who are doctors) and they won't say anything that might cost them their license - 'Why Your DOCTOR is ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED' : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAvemcgLa-8
Thanks for your other messages, I'll look forward to chatting again,
David
I have found nothing to suggest Martin should even be at the discussion table. I think he may have a serious case of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophenia
I support monetary reform and a change in economic policy for the benefit of the people.
Two questions on this post:
What are Martin's credentials?
Why wouldn't constitutional rights protect us from your worst fears? Criminals sometimes get off because of our rigid support of constitutional rights.
https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-the-mrna-coronavirus-vaccine-is-a-vaccine-and-it-is-designed-to-pre-idUSKBN2AM0SF/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mcammartin
Hi Joseph,
thank you for your questions.
(1). David E. Martin' credentials: 'National Intelligence Analyst, Founder of IQ100 Index (NYSE)' - Developer of linguistic genomics: https://youtu.be/NJhAOETXlNw?t=15
I've not seen anyone try to debunk these qualifications (coincidentally, I questioned Reuters' dubious fact checking in my last post).
(2). A lot of people (in Canada) don't think that the Constitution provides real protection, because of the Notwithstanding Clause and the degree to which many points are open to interpretation. Some feel the Bill of Rights offers individuals better protection. I'm not a lawyer of course. Brian Peckford and Maxime Bernier's Constitutional Challenge on travel restrictions was shut down - dismissed as 'Mute' - when travel restrictions were lifted. So we don't know the Constitutionality of this because the courts would not let the case proceed. I've even been called 'far-right' while canvasing, just for mentioning 'the Constitution.' So there are larger issues here that need to be addressed.
With respect to the Reuters' piece, again. The definition of Pandemic was changed in order to market mRNA products as 'vaccines,' and Dr. David Martin is precisely right in his explanation of how these products work (if you read the manufacturers own documents). Martin is quoted as saying (though that video has been removed): "It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator.” This is correct. The problems discovered since 2021 however, are: (a) there is no control of how much or how little 'pathogen' is created by the body; and (b) when, or if, the body's own creation of this pathogen (spike protein) shuts off. These are major problems that haven't been addressed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFzTTuuzfH0
As mentioned above. MP Ted Falk asked a lot of questions in parliament with regards to Bill C-293, 'An Act respecting pandemic prevention and preparedness.' These questions were not answered before Liberals and NDP pushed this Bill though the House of Commons (it now in Senate for Second Reading). His questions can be seen at open Parliament, here:
https://openparliament.ca/bills/44-1/C-293/?singlepage=1
Please write to Canadian Senators to ask them to address these questions.
Thanks again for your interest.
Thank you for the extremely detailed reply!!
1. I am not sure you addressed my belief that the hyper vigilant constitutional rights would make a surveillance society impossible. Though technology could help us better find and prosecute the tiny percent of the population the launders money, defrauds, deals in black markets including human trafficking, and evades taxes.
2. Also the linkedin profile shows Martin is very academically accomplished but does not show true expertise in medicine, in particular immunology, viruses, epidemiology, etc.
anymore than he is able to perform surgery.
To illustrate, I was once sent by my GP to a specialist, he sent me to several other specialists. One of which sent me to someone with a speciality within that specialty.
The world is complicated. I highly recommend the book - The Knowledge Illusion.